Navigation

    IO Rodeo Forum

    • Register
    • Login

    Cyclic voltammetry on 0.1M KCl

    Rodeostat
    2
    4
    4146
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      James last edited by

      I had the rodeostat hooked up with the CH Instrument counter electrode and Ag/AgCl reference electrodes. I made the same carbon paste electrode shown in the blog. https://blog.iorodeo.com/making-a-carbon-paste-electrode/

      Next I placed the electrodes in the beaker and ran cyclic voltammetry on 0.1M KCl. 100uA, -1V to 1V, scan rate 0.5 V/s. I obtained a graph that looks like this.
      alt text
      Is this correct?

      Ran two cycles but the voltammetry doesn't overlap
      alt text

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Jo
        Jo last edited by

        Hi James,
        A couple of notes.

        • In the ascorbate experiment described here, I used 50 mV/s, whereas you are using 500 mV/s (0.5 V/s)

        • Also, in that experiment I was using ascorbate, so I think you can go ahead and start testing your set-up with ascorbate

        • In my experience, the first CV cycle is different from the rest of the cycles. For example, when I run the experiment with 5 cycles, cycles 2-5 are very similar and overlap, whereas cycle 1 will be slightly offset from these. I usually use the cycles that overlap and discard data from cycle 1

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          James last edited by

          Yes. I ran the tests with ascorbate. 0.5V/s seems to work fine, 50mV/s is very slow, took like 5+ min for 5 cycles.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Jo
            Jo last edited by

            Hi James,
            I would recommend running the cyclic voltammetry experiment from 0.1 V to 1.0 V, at 50 mV/s for a few cycles (3-4 should be plenty). That would be a direct comparison to the experiment I described.
            Let me know how that experiment works and we can go from there.
            Jo

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post